A BAD BET ; PENTAGON DESERVES CRITICISM FOR TRYING TO DEPLOY A WEAPON OF MASS STUPIDITY 31 July 2003 Buffalo News FINAL B12 The most stunning thing about a Pentagon proposal to establish an Internet wagering site for bets on atrocities and terrorism is that someone, somewhere in a defense complex trusted with the use of awesome powers, actually thought it was a good idea. That lack of judgment is troublesome, even if the level of disgust and disbelief at this proposal was enough to kill it quickly. In announcing its death, Senate Armed Forces Committee John Warner, R-Va., added that Congress will make sure it stays dead by pulling its funding. This idiotic idea was the brainchild of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), which also runs the much- criticized computerized surveillance project known as the Terrorism Awareness Information program. The plan was to open a federal betting parlor on such questions as whether Jordan's king will be overthrown, Yasser Arafat will be assassinated or North Korea will launch a missile attack. Styled as a futures market, the Policy Analysis Market site would have allowed registered traders to put money behind their predictions, drawing profits from the pool if their predictions came true. Here's a prediction: This harebrained idea would have harmed America's image around the world (and probably already has). It could have encouraged the kinds of terrorist activity it targeted for wagering. And any information it gathered -- DARPA apparently was hoping for insider information and a read on the probability of events -- would be worth far less than real knowledge garnered by improved and better-funded intelligence programs. The project, it turns out, was headed by retired Adm. John Poindexter, the Johnny Appleseed of bad ideas who also runs the Terrorism Awareness Information program. He was the national security adviser to former president Ronald Reagan, and helped hatch the scheme to sell arms to Iran and funnel the proceeds to Nicaraguan rebels in what became known as the Iran-Contra scandal. Poindexter was convicted of lying to Congress, a conviction that ultimately was overturned on appeal. DARPA already has spent $600,000 on the project, wanted to spend $149,000 more this year and was asking for $8 million over the next two years. It would be far cheaper -- and better for the country -- just to fire Poindexter. Americans should be as outraged at this kind of thinking as they would by a foreign Web site that sought bets on the assassination of an American president or an attack on the Statue of Liberty. This idea was, as Sen. Tom Daschle, D-S.D., quickly noted, "irresponsible." That would be among the milder words that could be used to describe this wrongheaded plan.