![]() |
||
| Bush or Kerry? You Bet! By Donald Luskin January 30, 2004
I LOVE MARKETS. Just think of all the things they make possible.
Whenever there's a way for people to trade with each other, they always
find ways to make money and reduce risk. So whenever market principles
get applied in new ways, the world becomes a better place.
Right now it's happening in the realm of politics. Readers of this column1
know I believe that politics is the No. 1 force acting on the stock and
bond markets — but this is something else again. It's a market in
politics itself.
It's called Tradesports.com2.
When you first visit the site, don't make the mistake of thinking that
this is some online betting parlor. This is a sophisticated futures
market. No, you won't find contracts on pork bellies. You'll find
contracts on an astonishing variety of events — sports events, market
and economic events, news events, and political events. Even terrorist
events!
Let's take a look at the most actively traded futures contract
on Tradesports.com, the contract on George Bush winning the 2004 U.S.
presidential election. Right now that contract trades an average daily
volume valued at about $1 million.
Here's how it works. The day after the November elections, the contract
will expire. It will be priced at 100 points if Bush is reelected, and
zero if he is not — and 100 points equals $10 per contract.
As of this writing, it's trading at 71. If you bought the contract at
71, and Bush is reelected, you'd make 29 points (because then the
contract would expire at a value of 100). Those 29 points represent
$2.90 per $10 contract — so if you had bought 1000 contracts your total
profit would be $2,900.
Of course, as in any futures market, for every buyer there has to be a
seller. Or more precisely, for every long there has to be a short. In
this example, the short would lose 29 points, or $2.90 per contract.
But suppose Bush loses. Then the contract would expire at a value of
zero, so the long would lose $7.10 per contract, and the short would
gain $7.10 per contract. By the way, both sides pay a commission of 4
cents per contract for every trade.
Tradesports.com trades similar contracts on dozens of political
events. For example, there are contracts on every Democratic hopeful,
so you can speculate on which one will win each state primary, and
other contracts for the party's nomination.
What can you actually do with these contracts? Well, if you're smart, you can make money.
Small fortunes were made by people who dared to buy a penny-stock
called John Kerry just before the Iowa caucuses. After the upset, his
nomination contract went from two to 65 — a 3,250% return in a matter
of days (now, after New Hampshire, Kerry is trading at 68). At the same
time, after Iowa, the Dean contract went from 78 to 11 (they don't call
him "the Internet candidate" for nothing — that was a genuine
dot-com-style stock crash). He's now at 8.5.
But as with all markets, there's more than just the speculative
profit motive. All of society benefits from the information embedded in
prices at Tradesports.com, because these prices reveal the world's best
estimate of the probabilities of various future events. It's the
ultimate poll.
For example, that Bush reelection contract priced at 71 points
is telling us that, right now, Bush has a 71% probability of being
reelected. Traditional opinion polls tell you only what percentage of
voters say they will do in the future; polls don't give you the
probabilities of various outcomes.
Knowing the probabilities helps people make better decisions about how
to invest and how to hedge. That's why Admiral Poindexter assigned the
Defense Advanced Research Projects Administration to develop a futures
market in terrorist events. He thought that would be the best way to
help Homeland Defense, national security and intelligence officials get
a handle on what the risks are out there.
When the media got wind of Poindexter's idea, they made it seem so
whacky that it was immediately abandoned. Yet Tradesports.com is
up-and-running right now with exactly the same concept. Before the
U.S.-led coalition invaded Iraq, Tradesports.com listed contracts on
whether Saddam Hussein would be in power as of particular dates in the
future. Today there are contracts on whether Osama bin Laden will be
apprehended, and on the color-coded terror alert level in the U.S. at
year-end 2004.
What use is all of that to investors? For one thing, Tradesports.com's
contracts are an objective barometer of what the market is thinking
about various risks. A year ago, when the U.S. was still undecided
about whether and how to invade Iraq, the markets were buffeted by
volatile moves that the media never failed to blame on imagined
investor perceptions about the chances of a war. Well, with
Tradesports.com, there's no need to imagine. Just look at the changes
in prices of the Saddam contracts, and you can see for sure whether the
market's assessment of the probability of war went up, down or sideways
that day.
Remember that this election year as the media begins to
attribute market moves to the market's perception of Bush's reelection
chances. The Tradesports.com contracts will tell us for sure what the
market really thinks about that — so when we see the Dow rise or fall
150 points on a particular day, we can start making more intelligent
judgments as to why.
Of course, the most straightforward use of the Tradesports.com
contracts is simply to trade them. Let's say you think Bush will be
reelected, and that the market will go up as a result. So ordinarily
you'd buy stocks based on that — and that would be an entirely
legitimate investment strategy.
But that's two propositions in one, isn't it? You could be
right on Bush, but wrong on the market for any number of reasons. But
at Tradesports.com, you can separate those two propositions, and just
speculate on Bush (or against him, if that's your call). Of course,
when you separate the propositions that way it feels more like
"gambling" and less like "investing," but if you think about it
rigorously I defy you to articulate any real distinction.
Speaking of gambling, I won't offer an opinion on whether it's
legal for Americans to use Tradesports.com. Tradesports.com is
domiciled in Dublin, Ireland, where it's entirely legal. There, it
isn't regulated either as a gambling site or as a futures exchange — it
falls in between the regulatory cracks, as all great innovations seem
to do. As Chief Executive John Delaney put it — invoking an Irish
expression — "The law doesn't come within an ass's roar of knowing what
to do with us."
Let me just say that I am unaware of any specific legal reason for
Americans not to participate. I've opened a Tradesports.com account,
but I haven't used it so far. I don't have any particular legal concern
about it. I just haven't found the contract I want to invest in yet.
But believing as I do that politics moves the market, it's only
a matter of time before I fire up my laptop, go online and put my money
where my mouse is. I love markets!
Donald Luskin is chief investment officer of Trend Macrolytics, an
economics consulting firm serving institutional investors. You may
contact him at don@trendmacro.com3. 1http://www.smartmoney.com/aheadofthecurve/index.cfm?story=20040102 |