Gambling with the future
Kevin Clarke. U.S. Catholic. Chicago: Oct 2003.Vol.68, Iss. 10;  pg. 35
 
America's political orthodoxy demands a free market for everything except 
new ideas.

AN OPPORTUNITY FOR GOOD, CLEAN PROFIT-TAKING WAS ruined last July by the 
biased left-wing media when it reported on the impending opening of the 
Policy Analysis Market, essentially a futures market on terror. PAM's 
opening bell was supposed to have sounded this month, but the idea proved so 
plainly and immediately repugnant, members of the Bush administration 
quickly bum-rushed poor PAM out the door.

PAM was sponsored by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, an 
obscure Washington agency that provided a brief sanctuary to pipe-smoking, 
political Lazarus Admiral John Poindexter. His previous big idea for DARPA 
was the paranoia-inducing Total Information Awareness System--an effort to 
review all electronic and paper communication in the nation. Think "Little 
Brother."
Enlarge 200%
Enlarge 400%

This time the gang in Poindexter's ideology lab came up with a program 
clinically cold-blooded in its strategic goals and merely morally repulsive 
in all other respects: PAM would have organized speculators with extra 
capital not already gainfully invested in oil, defense, or Third World 
apparel production into a gambling den focused on Middle Eastern events: 
assassinations, political upheavals, military turnabouts--you get the idea. 
It was a futures market for mayhem, and your tax dollars--$8 million of 
them--were ear-marked to set it up as a small mind game in the war on terror.

Poindexter and crew believed that just as the commodities futures market 
predicts the cost of a barrel of oil and allows industry to prepare for 
price moves, PAM could help U.S. defense planners prepare for impending 
terrorist strikes by tracking "market predictions" of such events. But when 
news of the terror market leaked out, most normal people went into 
jaw-dropped moral-shock mode. Whatever PAM's dubious strategic value, the 
image of a group of cigar-chomping fat-cats wagering on next week's 
bloodiest headlines should have made PAM a self-evident nonstarter.

What is most interesting about this stillborn program, however, is not its 
amoral audacity or its astonishing indifference to simple decency but its 
testimony to the lock-grip the free market has over Washington's political 
imagination. From trade, health care, Social Security, and now defense 
policy, neo-conservatives so worship the omniscience of the free market 
that, confronted with any social or political difficulty, their first 
impulse appears to be to find some way to construct a market around it.

Unable to acknowledge the obvious failure of free-market mechanisms to lift 
the developing world out of the poverty that has crucified its inhabitants, 
the free-market cabal seems compelled to propose market-oriented solutions 
for just about everything--except new ideas. Washington's free-market 
priesthood is rabidly intolerant of alternative economic or political 
strategies or the slightest expressions of doubt among its faithful.

When an economic philosophy demands such orthodoxy and denies the empirical 
in this manner, it escapes the realm of mere ideology and touches a 
different atmosphere altogether--one of passion and transcendent belief: a 
religion. The 10 Commandments remain pretty popular in the U.S. these days. 
Our free market fellowship might want to reread that first one when they get 
a chance.

POPE JOHN PAUL II WORRIED OVER SUCH "IDOLATRY OF THE market" in his 1991 
encyclical Centesimus Annus, but what also concerns the pope is the limiting 
effect free-market idolatry compels on reimagining political and economic 
structures. The pope argues that our social vision should not be limited to 
a depressing choice between the inefficiencies of central planning or the 
inhumanity of the free market.

Instead of surrendering our future to a radically unrestrained free market, 
the pope has said, "It is necessary to undertake new roads, inspired by 
solid moral premises" that include the "dignity of the individual person" 
and an international "culture of solidarity" to which all Catholics aspire.

PAM has been ritually sacrificed on the altar of public opinion, but it will 
take a lot more to stamp out the free-market heresy currently entrancing 
America's political Magi. The social teaching of the church offers a solid 
foundation for a more nuanced approach to resolving the complex problems of 
our modern world.

Now, if we could only sell that m Washington . . .
[Author Affiliation]
By KEVIN CLARKE, contributing editor to U.S. CATHOLIC and managing editor of 
online products at Claretian Publications in Chicago.