U.S. News & World Report, August 1, 2003 pNA More Markets for Mayhem. (Web Exclusive)(terror market) James M. Pethokoukis. The Policy Analysis Market was a bad bet for John Poindexter. He's the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency official who's taking the fall for the roundly criticized terror market, where traders could have bet on events like coups and assassination--a ``futures market in death,'' as Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton delicately termed the proposal. But similar markets are already taking bets. Poindexter's own fate was the subject of wagers at TradeSports.Com, a Dublin-based online betting site where speculators can bet on current events--including terrorism--as well as sports and other traditional wager material. The betting on the site correctly placed good odds that Poindexter would resign. TradeSports allows members to trade directly with each other, charging a 4-cent transaction fee per bet. Other current-event bets include whether Saddam Hussein or Osama bin Laden will be ``captured or neutralized'' by the end of December (about a 65 percent chance that time will run out for Saddam and a 25 percent chance for bin Laden, according to the betting). The chances of finding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq by the end of September? Again, about 25 percent. Should you take any of these odds seriously? A Stanford University study http://mutex.gmu.edu:2838/zitzewitz/Research/iraq.pdf of the site found that bets about the chances of an Iraq war closely tracked spot oil prices, considered a pretty good indicator of the chances for conflict in the Middle East. I asked Tom Bell http://www.tomwbell.com/, an Internet law professor at the Chapman University School of Law in Orange, Calif., whether it's legal for Americans to join the fun. His take: ``It is probably illegal for residents of the U.S. to use the Internet to use TradeSports to bet on pure sporting events. I take it that TS has no U.S. licenses to engage in that form of commerce, after all.'' But Bell adds that some of TradeSports' less conventional bets--such as those on current events--may well escape the definition of gambling under U.S. law, because it could be argued that skill and knowledge, not just random chance, determine how well you do. ``In that event, TS would represent, at worst, unlicensed futures trading and, at best, just a game of skill, '' he says. There are other betting options. Another site with a good reputation for accuracy is the Foresight Exchange www.ideosphere.com, where bets can be made on pretty much anything, including the 2004 U.S. presidential election and whether Apple Computer will go belly up by 2005. One big difference from TradeSports? Only pretend money is used.